Insurance Jottings
UK Financial Services Firms Prepare for Worst in Brexit Trade Talks
Britain’s finance sector is losing hope of securing even basic access to European Union markets from the 31st December, as talk that the EU wants UK fishing rights in exchange draws the industry into a political struggle between the bloc and its departing member.
Hopes were high that Prime Minister Boris Johnson would prioritise the financial sector — Britain’s largest export industry and biggest corporate tax generator — in trade talks.
But bank sources say a push by the EU for fishing access to UK waters and London’s stance that it will diverge from EU rules are prompting them to review hard-Brexit plans which could see more jobs than anticipated move to Europe.
Until now, financial firms running EU operations from Britain believed that technical assessments by EU banking, insurance and markets regulators would be enough judge UK rules ‘equivalent’ to those governing EU-based firms, granting them market access after December.
But banking sources say the EU’s executive now sees things differently.
Sources from three international banks fear that access will depend on a broader trade-off such as Britain allowing fishing in its waters — a concession they feel the government is reluctant to make.
“We’re now hearing very explicitly — it’s not even the rumour mill — the European Commission has said these are politically linked to progress in phase-two negotiations,” one banking source told Reuters.
“As one official put it to me, if ‘fish for financial services’ is going badly, this will impact the Commission’s willingness to grant equivalence.”
The fishing industry is valued at about 169 times less than financial services and official data shows it employs just 8,000 people compared with more than a million in finance.
But regaining control of Britain’s rich fishing waters was a totem for Brexit campaigners.
A European Commission spokesman referred to a January EU document saying the bloc and Britain should endeavour to complete equivalence assessments before the 30th June. He declined to comment further.
The EU is Britain’s biggest financial services export market, worth about £26 billion annually.
Since the 2016 Brexit vote, the sector has reorganised to preserve a foothold in the EU, launching or beefing up subsidiaries and relocating staff and capital. Many banks and money managers are preparing for a further transfer of resources after a transition period ends in December.
Consultants EY said this week that around 7,000 financial services jobs will move from Britain to staff new EU hubs.
Failing to obtain equivalence could add risk-management, compliance, middle and back office roles to that figure, as well as trading and client-facing jobs, the sources said.
Finance minister Sajid Javid said last week that Britain would not be a rule-taker after Brexit, even though some businesses could suffer from regulatory divergence.
He wants “outcomes-based” equivalence in financial services, meaning UK rules need not be identical to those in the EU but should have the same effect.
The EU updated its equivalence policy ahead of Brexit, saying third-country regimes like those in Japan and the United States do not need to be identical but must have the same “outcomes” as EU rules to give access to its markets.
But it would impose tougher scrutiny of “high-impact” countries, expected to include Britain.
The EU’s withdrawal of share trading equivalence from Switzerland during a dispute over a partnership treaty, not because of any divergence in rules, showed how equivalence can be politicised.
Britain’s finance ministry had no immediate comment.
Cost and Scrutiny
Bankers say jobs transferred to Europe as politicians wrangle are likely to stay there, even if equivalence is eventually granted.
“The sector’s approach has always been to prepare in a way for the worst,” a second senior banking source said.
Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos last week, Deutsche Bank CEO Christian Sewing recognised the risk that a trade deal would not be finalised before end-2020.
He said his bank “could do everything out of Frankfurt” but that Britain would remain an important capital market.
Financial lobby groups have warned that if Britain does not get equivalence, the government will lose valuable tax revenue.
The bloc is the biggest customer for Britain’s financial services exports, worth about £26 billion annually based on unfettered access.
But lawmakers from Mr Johnson’s Conservative Party say the City could cope with the fallout if negotiations turned sour.
“London is a marketplace. The marketplace doesn’t come to them (the EU) … the health of the City doesn’t depend nearly to the extent that is believed on having some privileged position in the EU,” said Peter Lilley, who sits in parliament’s upper chamber.
A second Conservative lawmaker, Tim Loughton, said Mr Johnson would not consider swapping assets such as fishing rights to cut a better deal for banks, which have struggled to rebuild their image since the 2008 financial crisis.
He said the EU was bluffing and would not politicise financial services because it, too, risked losing access to the region’s deepest markets. “It would be a massive exercise in cutting off your nose to spite your face,” he said.
Lloyd’s raises electronic placement target to 80%
Lloyd’s has mandated that 80 percent of bound risks must be placed electronically, up from the 70 percent target it set for the fourth quarter of last year.
Navigators & General acquires NMU Marine Trade business
UK insurer Navigators and General (N&G), a member of the Zurich Insurance Group, has reached an agreement with specialty insurer NMU to acquire its ex-GJW commercial marine trade combined book as it further expands its scale in the market.
EY flags up potential post-Brexit risk for insurers
With Brexit preparations across the insurance industry in top gear since last year, a sector expert highlights an exposure risk which is worth revisiting.
Brexit planning has been a fact of life for the global insurance sector since the UK referendum in 2016. However, an insurance expert from EY has flagged a post-Brexit risk for international insurers which deserves more attention.
Kabaria Bhattacharya, associate partner at EY, told Intelligent Insurer that most large outbound insurers operating in life insurance, property and casualty have been working on the assumption of a no-deal Brexit since the 31st March 2019.
“These insurers have already ensured they have the necessary permissions and licences as well as setting up target operating models,” she said. And for inbound insurers there will still be time to fulfil their regulatory obligations after the 31st January 2020.
“Some firms may need to think about capital model changes and regulatory reporting, but these aren’t immediate issues,” she added.
However, Ms Bhattacharaya added that insurers with expatriate exposures may be at risk, “customers may have moved to somewhere in Europe potentially to retire and this could create an EU exposure for firms”.
AIG’s Duperreault bucks coal retrenchment trend
Unlike the growing cohort of international insurers backing away from thermal coal insurance and investments, American International Group’s chief executive Brian Duperreault told the World Economic Forum (WEF) conference in Switzerland that he is not prepared to drop the sector. He did not give any compelling reasons.
Climate change ‘altering risk profile’ for insuring renewables
As the renewables market continues to grow, re/insurers are increasingly seeking growth by underwriting the risks associated with the sector. But it can present very different challenges to fossil fuels and the transition has not always been a smooth one, Fraser McLachlan, CEO at GCube Underwriting said in an interview.
North P&I Club partners with SureNav on maritime navigation
North P&I Club has partnered with SureNav, a company which works with ship operators to identify gaps in bridge team performance and compliance, in an effort to promote safe navigation and improve standards across the maritime industry.